Duloxetine DR Capsules USP 60 mg
CGMP Deviations: Presence of N-nitroso-duloxetine impurity above recommended interim limit
411 recalls · Class II, newest first
CGMP Deviations: Presence of N-nitroso-duloxetine impurity above recommended interim limit
CGMP Deviations: Presence of N-nitroso-duloxetine impurity above recommended interim limit
CGMP Deviations: Presence of N-nitroso-duloxetine impurity above recommended interim limit
Superpotent Drug and Subpotent Drug: potency failures obtained
Superpotent Drug and Subpotent Drug: potency failures obtained
Superpotent Drug and Subpotent Drug: potency failures obtained
Superpotent Drug and Subpotent Drug: potency failures obtained
Superpotent Drug and Subpotent Drug: potency failures obtained
Superpotent Drug and Subpotent Drug: potency failures obtained
Superpotent Drug and Subpotent Drug: potency failures obtained
Superpotent Drug and Subpotent Drug: potency failures obtained
Superpotent Drug and Subpotent Drug: potency failures obtained
Superpotent Drug and Subpotent Drug: potency failures obtained
Superpotent Drug and Subpotent Drug: potency failures obtained
Presence of Foreign Object: A pharmacist discovered a metal fragment embedded in a lisinopril 10 mg tablet.
cGMP Deviations: the firm initiated a recall after notification from the distributor that product may be tainted with undeclared diclofenac and omeprazole, however there is no analytical data confirming that product distributed by the firm is tainted.
CGMP deviations: the bulk product was rejected by the Quality Unit after routine inspection of the mixing vessel showed scratches on the sides and bottom of the mixing vessel. Product was to be rejected but was inadvertently released and shipped to customers.
CGMP deviations: the bulk product was rejected by the Quality Unit after routine inspection of the mixing vessel showed scratches on the sides and bottom of the mixing vessel. Product was to be rejected but was inadvertently released and shipped to customers.
CGMP deviations: the bulk product was rejected by the Quality Unit after routine inspection of the mixing vessel showed scratches on the sides and bottom of the mixing vessel. Product was to be rejected but was inadvertently released and shipped to customers.
CGMP deviations: the bulk product was rejected by the Quality Unit after routine inspection of the mixing vessel showed scratches on the sides and bottom of the mixing vessel. Product was to be rejected but was inadvertently released and shipped to customers.
CGMP deviations: the bulk product was rejected by the Quality Unit after routine inspection of the mixing vessel showed scratches on the sides and bottom of the mixing vessel. Product was to be rejected but was inadvertently released and shipped to customers.
CGMP deviations: the bulk product was rejected by the Quality Unit after routine inspection of the mixing vessel showed scratches on the sides and bottom of the mixing vessel. Product was to be rejected but was inadvertently released and shipped to customers.
CGMP deviations: the bulk product was rejected by the Quality Unit after routine inspection of the mixing vessel showed scratches on the sides and bottom of the mixing vessel. Product was to be rejected but was inadvertently released and shipped to customers.
CGMP deviations: the bulk product was rejected by the Quality Unit after routine inspection of the mixing vessel showed scratches on the sides and bottom of the mixing vessel. Product was to be rejected but was inadvertently released and shipped to customers.
CGMP deviations: the bulk product was rejected by the Quality Unit after routine inspection of the mixing vessel showed scratches on the sides and bottom of the mixing vessel. Product was to be rejected but was inadvertently released and shipped to customers.